The new Non-Nude Playboy pushes the CREEPY image of “a teenage girl – possibly underage – sending sexts”

Sarah McDaniel - photo credit: Playboy

Sarah McDaniel – photo credit: Playboy

***UPDATE: It appears Hugh Hefner of Playboy has already laid the groundwork to gain direct access to HIGHSCHOOL STUDENTS (click here to learn more). 

Alexandra Mayers aka Monica Foster commentary: Well, America’s favorite DIRTY OLD MAN NEXT DOOR has really done it now – so let THIS be his LEGACY…

Sure, on the surface Hugh Hefner of Playboy seems to be cleaning up his act before he croaks by throwing out the bodily fluid drenched “nudity towel” via the announcement that he’s transforming Playboy magazine from an adult nude smut rag into a non-nude “mainstream” periodical… Well the truth of the matter, is that the NEW Non-Nude Playboy (in quite a few observer’s opinion) is more creepy, lurid, predatory and dangerous than YOU EVER THOUGHT IMAGINABLE.



In the words of Louise Burke of Telegraphic.uk.co:

“Playboy’s new look is supposed to be about reconnecting with a young, internet-savvy audience. It’s fresh, clean, and more innocent, like the girl-next-door covers of earlier times. 

But instead I find it evokes a much creepier sense of “innocence”: that of a teenage girl – possibly underage – sending sexts. Who to? Us? Her boyfriend? A middle-aged politician perhaps… 

Twenty-year-old McDaniel has been made to look more girlish than usual with a high camera angle and a toothy pout. A flick through some of the other images from the shoot makes the message clear:  this is a teenager taking sexy selfies in her bedroom.

At least with naked photos of Pamela Anderson, there’s no mistaking she is a fully grown woman, not someone apparently cast in the image of a teenager sending naked pictures to an unknown man on the end of an internet connection.”

Alleged Playboy porn director and pedophile who's faced criminal charges Donny Pauling at the Playboy Mansion

Playboy porn director and alleged pedophile (who’s faced criminal charges) Donny Pauling at the Playboy Mansion

So Playboy magazine has officially become the GATEWAY of underage CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.  Yes, I said it. At this point, Playboy could essentially feature and exploit the entire underage lineup of teenage Disney Channel and Nickelodeon stars in their magazine considering their new “NON-NUDE” format and get away with it…

No wonder Hugh Hefner’s son Cooper is pissed off.

As we already know, Playboy hires pornographers such Donny Pauling who allegedly have a propensity for pedophilia (and have faced criminal charges for such allegations)… In fact, Playboy was FOUNDED in part on the image of a BARELY LEGAL (possibly underage) girl due to Hugh Hefner’s relationship Barbie Benton – an 18 year old girl Hefner (who at the time was 42) had a long term relationship with.

When it comes down to it, Playboy has always been the porn industry’s primary “lure” into an interest in hardcore pornography – and I’m not only referring to the interest of their male viewing audience… Playboy is the #1 recruitment mechanism of FEMALES into the tawdry and dangerous world of PERFORMING in adult movies.

High Hefner with his little girlfriend Barbie Benton

High Hefner with his little girlfriend Barbie Benton

On nearly a daily basis pornographers all over the country place ads in newspapers and online job sites such as Backpage.com seeking young women who are interested in “Playboy style modeling”.  Now that Playboy is no longer a nude magazine, predatory pornographers will have an even EASIER time recruiting young women who initially aren’t interested in taking off their clothes…

Allow me to explain exactly how the “recruit a girl into porn”/sextrafficking process for pornographers will go from now on:

  1. Place ad in newspaper or an online classifieds source such as Backpage seeking girls for “NEW Playboy Style NON-NUDE / Victoria’s Secret type” photo shoots
  2. Take photos of girl in lingerie.
  3. Pay girl for one “lingerie” type shoot.
  4. Offer girl more work that’s “Old Playboy style” (just nudity) for more money. State that Playboy was a nude magazine for DECADES and that it’s no big deal to convince the girl to do it.
  5. Offer girl more work that’s softcore Girl-Girl, then hardcore Girl-Girl, then hardcore Boy-Girl (and if she’s resistant send her to Vivid, Digital Playground or TrenchcoatX, offer her a contract and tell her that she’ll be the NEW Kim Kardashian, Farrah Abraham, Tila Tequila, Jenna Jameson or Pamela Anderson).

Of course, before the girl knows it, she’ll be pimped on some illegal escort (prostitution) website such as TheLuxuryCompanion.com and will wind up sleeping with some HIV positive Hollywood actor like Charlie Sheen, but here’s the important point…

Many girls who would have said "NO" to Playboy Nude photoshoots will gladly say "YES" to Playboy Non-Nude photoshoots - the pornographers and their illegal pimp friends who run prostitution rings are counting on it.

Many girls who would have said “NO” to Playboy Nude photoshoots will gladly say “YES” to Playboy Non-Nude photoshoots – the pornographers and their illegal pimp friends who run prostitution rings are counting on it.

Unlike with the nude-Playboy magazine as the initial “lure”, the scope to recruit young girls into what’s ultimately hardcore pornography has SUBSTANTIALLY BROADENED. Whereas in the past, many young women would pass over a “Playboy style” photoshoot due to it being NUDE, today with the magazine being NON-NUDE, young girls who are perfectly OK with Victoria’s Secret style catalog modeling will readily respond to the ads to be in NON-NUDE Playboy Style photoshoot (which is exactly what the porn industry as a whole is counting on).

It’s important to keep in mind that Playboy magazine and pornography as a whole has historically been no more than an advertising venue for illegal prostitution.   Today, the prostitution rings the porn industry is built on have clients who have come to prefer Victoria’s Secret type models rather than Vivid or Brazzers type pornstar “skanks”. For the prostitution ring’s pimps to be able to meet their client’s demand for prettier, better educated and “cleaner” young girls, they had to change their strategy to pull the girls in – and it seems Hugh Hefner and friends knew EXACTLY what to do…

What really creeped me out upon entering the Los Angeles porn industry back in 2008 was how YOUNG I noticed my female pornstar peers were.  At the time, I was 29 years old and I expected that the women I’d be working with would be like myself – fully developed adult WOMEN.  Instead I found myself as a “new and fresh face” surrounded by girls I could have sworn should still be Freshmen in Highschool… It floored me that there was such a “demand” for what appeared to be pre-pubescent bodies.  At 29 years old I was often asked by 40 to 60 year old porn directors why I decided to get into porn so “late in life”.  That question truly surprised me because I didn’t consider being 29 years old to be “OLD”.

Hugh Hefner - America's DIRTY OLD MAN NEXT DOOR and his wife who looks like she could be his daughter (or grand daughter).

Hugh Hefner – America’s DIRTY OLD MAN NEXT DOOR and his wife who looks like she could be his daughter (or grand daughter). GROSS.

The truth I quickly learned back in 2008, is that a high percentage of the “behind the scenes” porn professionals are ephebophiles and pedophiles.  In late 2013 I actually uncovered that the porn industry’s political face (the Free Speech Coalition) openly condones and matriculates with KNOWN and CONVICTED pedophiles. The men of the porn industry for the most part are not into WOMEN.  They are into little girls and frankly – it’s gross.

I think what Playboy (and the porn industry as a whole) will find in time, is that the only people who will purchase their product will be the rapidly shrinking demographic of sickos like themselves.  Real men (who are psychologically healthy) are attracted to fully developed ADULT women, not children – just as REAL WOMEN (who are both physically and psychologically adults) don’t want men with the Peter Pan mentality of pornographers or America’s DIRTY OLD MAN NEXT DOOR Hugh Hefner.

article segment below via FoxNews.com

It is ironic and startling to consider that the marketplace has now become so flooded with pornography that Playboy—PLAYBOY!—has to cover up its girls in order to stand out.

But is the new magazine really “tamer” than its nudie predecessor? The answer is a resounding NO. For one thing, the photographs of naked women are still there. Their most intimate parts might be obscured by a hand or a tiny bit of clothing, but otherwise, these are the same objectified, sexualized females that the magazine has always featured.

Perhaps most disturbingly, this misleading “no nudity” idea has emboldened Playboy to present its women in an even younger context.  It’s right there on the cover of the debut issue, which features a girl who looks decidedly more naïve and innocent than the supposedly experienced and liberated Playboy Bunnies of yesteryear.

After viewing the cover and other preview images, Louise Burke summed it up perfectly in the UK Telegraph:

“…It evokes a much creepier sense of ‘innocence’: that of a teenage girl – possibly underage – sending sexts. Who to? Us? Her boyfriend? A middle-aged politician perhaps…Twenty-year-old McDaniel has been made to look more girlish than usual with a high camera angle and a toothy pout. A flick through some of the other images from the shoot makes the message clear:  this is a teenager taking sexy selfies in her bedroom.

The new Playboy wants to present itself as “soft softcore.” But that is a false distinction anyway. As Matthew Scully noted in the Wall Street Journal in 2006, “Playboy Enterprises itself, years ago, dropped the pretense of refinement and delicacy, following the money into hard-core cable. Soft-core, hard-core, these were all along just degrees of exploitation and self-debasement…”

The new Playboy is just another stop on this sad continuum. Hyper-sexualized images of young (and younger) women. A false narrative of sexual freedom and female empowerment, albeit updated for the Instagram and Snapchat generation. When all is said and done, it’s still just pornography. Justice Potter Stewart’s statement is still true: “I know it when I see it.”

The new Playboy is the same as the old Playboy. It’s not “safe for work.” Or for anyone.

Just ask Terry Crews and his wife and four kids.

 

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monica Foster

I'm a Writer, Artist, Musician, Investigator, Researcher & brilliant resilient spirit who's improving her life one day at a time. My name is Alexandra Mayers, but once upon a time I was better known as Monica Foster. www.AlexandraMayers.com / www.AlexandraMayersLIVE.com